And now, the Moviegoer of the United States of America...
ood afternoon. As you know, I saw the horror movie entitled "The Strangers" two days ago at Regal Cinemas in Potomac Yard. I will now give a brief summary of the movie and then I will open up the floor to questions.
The film featured Scott Speedman and Liv Tyler as a couple (though not necessarily an "item") who were spending a sleepless and awkward night together in some unspecified but evidently remote location, when an aggressive pounding on the front door "arrested their attention," to put it mildly. (Truth to tell, it scared the living bejesus out of them both, as well it might.) Well, naturally, Scott's character, Jim, wonders who it could be at such an hour (what was it, 4 A.M. or something?), particularly considering the much ballyhooed "remoteness" of the location, which the film keeps harping on; nor can Tyler's character, Liz, hazard a guess, since it's Jim's place, after all, and she's apparently never been there before in her life. "Bang bang bang," comes the knocking again, again contrasting so starkly with the erstwhile deathly quiet of the countryside, where, as Jim later observes, not even dogs may be heard to bark. "Yes? Who is it?" Jim asks warily, but the visitor says nothing, apparently determined to keep the couple on tenterhooks regarding his (her or its) identity, not to mention his (her or its) motives. So Jim reluctantly makes his way to the front door with Kristen in tow, determined to shed some literal and figurative light on the reason behind this unprecedented ruckus, but when he opens the door, the couple sees....
gulp!
....
Almost nothing at all, thanks to a intermittently flickering porch light. (Wouldn't you know it?) Nevertheless, they can still make out the outline of what appears to be an attractive young woman, who, after a suitably spooky pause, asks them (in the dreamy voice of a drowsy child) if a certain "Tamara" is home.

Afraid you might be sharing office space with a psychopathic killer? Show them that you're hip to their violent vibe and that you, for one, refuse to go gently into any supposititious good night! Pardon you for being old-fashioned, but you'll let the legitimate board-certified grim reaper settle your hash when the time comes, and not one minute before! In short, purchase this mouse pad, folks, and tell that spooky and eternally hovering nutcase in that office of yours to (and I quote...) Stab THIS!!!
Jim assures the spacey but still motionless visitor that there's no Tamara there, certain or otherwise, but the young woman appears unconvinced, judging both by her refusal to leave and her furtive attempts to look past the couple and into the house, as if expecting to see Tamara there for herself, notwithstanding Jim's assurances to the contrary.
The be-shadowed visitor finally relents and drifts slowly off of the porch, but she's soon back (or certainly appears to be so, judging by the renewed pounding on the front door), but this time Kristen must respond by herself since Jim has somewhat unhelpfully just ducked out for cigarettes (which will presumably be a time-consuming trip given the house's location in the sticks). "Is Tamara home?" comes the dreamy question once again. Well, if this didn't beat all. Rattled by the strange persistence of the shadow woman, Kristen walks to the door, but doesn't open it this time, merely reminding the woman, "You already came here," to which the mystery caller responds, once again in the disingenuous voice of a sleepy child, "Are you sure?"
The spooky woman soon relents once again, but now Kristen is more weirded out than ever.
I will say no more except that this dimly lit women on the front porch turns out to have plenty of additional tricks up her dimly lit sleeve when it comes to scaring Jim and Kristen (very possibly to death), nor is she alone in her seemingly inexplicable desire to do so.
Yes, Anne?
Sir, Anne of Green Gables: As you know, I live in the rural town of Cavendish in the remote Canadian province of Prince Edward Island, so I was just a little worried: Do these sorts of things really happen in real life?
What? You mean do Manson-like families show up at remote cabins and lord it over the luckless residents with axes and shotguns while wearing spooky masks?
Well, yes. I mean, this IS fiction, right?
Well, as I understand it, writer/director Bryan Bertino based the movie in a general sense on various actual crime incidents, but not on any one incident in particular.
That scarcely sets my mind at rest. (My, my!)
Still, you're probably at least marginally safer up there in Canada than your poor rural counterparts here in the states.
Mr. Moviegoer! Mr. Moviegoer!
My advice to you, Anne, would be to buy some very loud dogs.
Mr. Moviegoer!
In fact, after seeing the resourcefulness of the madmen in this movie, I would suggest buying two sets of dogs: One set to cover the house itself, and the other set to arrive like the backup cavalry in the unlikely but always possible event that your house dogs will have been poisoned in advance by the wily psychopaths in preparation for their planned killing spree.
Yes, Casey.
Casey Kasem from American Top 40. Can you tell me the name of the skipping record that plays in the movie trailer?
Yes, I believe it is "My First Lover" by Gillian Welch.
Thank you, sir.
Oh, and I believe that the words that it keeps "skipping" on are "Quicksilver girl."
I see. Very interesting.
Speaking of trailers, the movie has been nominated for a Golden Trailer Award under the categories of Best Horror and Best Sound Editing.
Yes, next question.
Wendy Houseman from Peter's Pandemic. There are reports that this movie is a remake of a French film called "Ils"? Can you comment on that?
No, I believe that "The Strangers" was written two years before "Ils."
I see.
Besides, "Ils" is apparently based on the Manson family, while "The Strangers" was inspired by psychopaths in general.
Mr. Moviegoer! Mr. Moviegoer!
Andy Rooney from Sixty Minutes. As you know, I'm always interested in finding picky reasons to come down on something -- whether it be a movie, a book, or indeed a political candidate.
Yes, Andy, and I've been meaning to talk to you about that. The way I see it -- Er (ahem!) but what's your question?
Can you tell us some picky little things that you found problematic about this movie?
Well, now, let me see.... Well, first of all, I thought that the opening disclaimer was a little weak -- or at least unnecessarily vague.
How so?
Well, the narrator tells us that the movie we're about to see is based on true events, right?
Right.
But then he goes on to say, as if in proof of that original statement, that there are millions of crimes committed in the United States every year.
Right.
But I'm like: Well, of course there are millions of crimes committed every year in a big country like this, but what does that have to do with convincing me that an outlyer event such as the one depicted in the movie could take place?
I see.
That's like telling someone that they could very well run into the Loch Ness Monster whenever they set sail in a boat, and then supporting that statement by pointing out that there are millions of fish in the sea.
Uh-huh.
I mean, so what? The number of fish in the sea is irrelevant (at least logically speaking) to the question of whether the fabled monster exists or not.
Gotcha.
It's as if the narrator were saying: Well, there are so many crimes out there that at least one of them is sure to resemble the one that you're about to see.
Uh-huh.
Which is not a very convincing argument, in my book.
If you don't mind, I'm writing this down for use next Sunday night. Any other petty complaints about the movie?
What else can you carp at?
Well, let me see: I can't say that those two "Mormon boys" rang true with me.
S
o
w
e
'
l
l
g
o
n
o
m
o
r
e
a
-
r
o
v
i
n
g
(
i
f
w
e
k
n
o
w
w
h
a
t
'
s
g
o
o
d
f
o
r
u
s
,
a
n
y
w
a
y
!
)
Apparently, Lord Byron had a run-in with a psycho killer, judging by this recently discovered ditty. Like the poet's infamous age-bashing lyrics of the year before ('what care I for the wreaths that can only bring glory', et cetera...) the following lines were also written 'on the road, between Florence and Pisa' -- the difference being that in this case, George appears to have been 'hauling arse' at the time of composition, at least if we're to believe the apparently panic-inspired note to that affect that the firebrand himself indited in the margins of this newly unearthed curio.
So we'll go no more a-roving
So late into the night,
Since that movie called "The Strangers"
Gave us both an awful fright
For our feet were made for walking,
Not for running for their life,
And our bodies are for clasping,
Not for stabbing with a knife
Though the night was made for loving
And the day returns too soon
We will go no more a-roving
Lest we run into a loon
How so?
Well, maybe I just live in the wrong part of the country, but where I come from, the cyclists with the impractical white shirts are always Jehovah's Witnesses, not Mormons, and they're always young adults, never children.
I see.
So when I first saw Mormon Boys #1 and #2, as they're called in the script, I thought it was Halloween and the youngsters were impersonating grown-up proselytizers.
Anything else?
Well, as you may have guessed by now, I thought the film was rather good....
Oh, come on: If you can't say something mean, don't say anything at all!
Okay, well, let's see: I didn't notice this alleged goof myself, mind, but I'm told that when Kristen runs outside and trips in a ditch, the tie around her hand that was serving as a bandage briefly disappears and then reappears between shots.
Yes, sir, Timmy Pipkin from down the street.
What's up, Tim-Tim?
I am writing a movie review for Mrs. Smith's class, and -- and -- and --
Take your time, Timmy.
And I would like to -- to -- to know the cast members' names and -- and -- and --
You want to know the cast members' names and what role they played, right, Timmy?
R-r-r-r-
Well, let me see. I've already mentioned Scott Speedman and Liv Tyler in the title roles of James Hoyt and Kristen McKay respectively.
W-w-what about-bou-bou-bou --
The bad guys?
Y-y-yes.
Well, I think the man in the mask was played by Kip Weeks, and the women were Laura Margolis as, quote, "the pin-up girl," and Gemma Ward as "Dollface."
And wh-wh-who--
Oh, and Glenn Howerton starred (albeit rather briefly) as the notoriously luckless family friend named Mike.
And what about the Mor-mor-mor-mor--
The Mormon Boys? They were played by (Lord help my memory: oh, what's that guy's name again?) Alex Fisher and... oh, yes: Peter Clayton-Luce! (Whew!)
Th-th-thank you, Mr. Moo-moo-moo--
Timmy, how old are you, by the way?
Elev-elev-eleven.
You do know that this movie is rated "R," don't you?
Y-y-y--
So you went to see it with your parents, then?
Y-yes.
Then I'm sure you won't mind if we call them right now to verify that fact. Nicholas, ring up old man Pipkins and see if this kid is on the level.
Mr. Moviegoer! Mr. Moviegoer!
No more questions, please!
When will the CD be coming out?!
I can't say.
Oh, come on!
Oh, probably in October! Now no more questions!!!
Mr. Moviegoer! Mr. Moviegoer!
Anne, you know better than this.
But what BREED of dog should I buy, sir?! What BREED!
S
t
a
n
d
u
p
f
o
r
L
o
o
n
i
e
s
!
Whoo-hoo!
Oh, I tell ya: Psychopaths: you gotta love 'em.
Confused Titters
No, wait a minute: That can't be right.
Confused Chuckles
Sorry about that, folks. You see, I come from the old school of stand-up comedy, where you were taught to say "you gotta love 'em" about everybody that you are about to poke fun at.
Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle
I mean, I'm not exactly the Pope of Greenwich Village up in here tonight, but even I understand that the psychopath contingent deserves our roundest possible censure. (Humph!)
Chuckle, titter, titter
If they expect ME to love them, they've got another thing coming.
Chuckles
Aye, and that "other thing," has a very cold shoulder on it indeed and its nose is pointed in the air with disdain.
Pause
Incidentally, I have no idea what I'm talking about, so if anybody else does, I'd appreciate a detailed explanation of my foregoing remarks, in long-hand is fine, on the back of a napkin. You can ask the waiters for a pen.

What's that, sir? I was supposed to be talking about the movie "The Strangers" tonight by writer/director Bryan Bertino? Oh, yeah.
No, seriously: The following true anecdote shows you just how scary I actually considered the movie to be.
Wow! Would you look at all the scribbled-on napkins that are piling up over here at the front of the stage? I can't wait to read them after this gig to find out what I was talking about earlier on.
No, seriously, this is absolutely true: I went into work immediately after I had seen that movie on a Sunday afternoon, right?
So there I am, all by my lonesome, in the 10th floor offices of some unspecified media-related business in Arlington, Virginia, when I suddenly begin thinking (which for me, of course, is always my "first mistake," as they say)....
I'm like, "What if I'm alone in this entire office suite (not to mention this entire building!) with precisely the sorts of psychopaths that I saw in the film?"
Of course, at some level, I knew that such a hypothesis was silly, but that didn't stop me from actually walking into this little back room that we have and peering behind the monitor-laden audiovisual racks -- for no other reason than to be 100% certain that no masked madman was back there, waiting to lay me low with an axe!
Laughter
I even murmured something along the lines of, "I know you're back here" as I was going back to look, just so that any potential sadist would realize that they weren't dealing with any garden variety of unsuspecting victim. No, sir.
Titters, chuckles, one good solid whoo-hoo
Well, like I says, "The Strangers" spooked my comic keister, you know what I'm saying?
You know, it's a good thing that I'm not a politician, because I would have left the theater with the firm intention of introducing a bill in the next session of Congress whereby masks (except for those worn by children on Halloween) would be banned in the United States.
Of course, such a Draconian measure would never pass the Senate (unless, of course, a majority of that august assembly had just seen the Bryan Bertino film as I had), but even the compromise version of the bill would probably still have "some teeth in it." For starters, I would insist on a seven-day waiting period for any adults who are interested in buying a mask, just so that the store owners can run the would-be purchaser's name through a database of psychopaths. (In the event that no such database exists, the bill will mandate its creation, say, by the year 2010 at the latest.)
Listen, you've been a great audience -- I see you've all cooperated with management and left your axes at the door.
No, seriously! Seriously!
Incidentally, I don't know why I keep saying "axes" because they weren't exactly the weapon of choice in the movie called "The Strangers." Still, the crazy trio somehow SEEMED like axe murderers.
In fact, if there were some parallel anti-world where psychopaths are considered the "normal" ones, then that world probably has its own set of anti-world talent agents. I can see it now: A would-be agent joins the trio in their pickup truck as they're callously leaving the scene of their latest butchery:
Agent: I've got one word for you guys: axes.
Pin-Up Girl: Axes?
Agent: Yes, axes! You should be out there swinging away with axes: think Jack Nicholson in The Shining or James Brolin in Amityville Horror.
Man in Mask: We already have an agent, thank you.
Agent: Well, he or she is certainly not doing right by you: You guys just scream "axe murderer," and how do you finally dispatch your victims? With an everyday kitchen knife: BORING!
Dollface: You should see the way that we dispatch superfluous Hollywood agents such as yourself.
Agent: Very funny, Dollface. (Not.) Now, I'll tell ya what I'm gonna do: I know a prop guy up at Universal: I'll meet you tomorrow at your next rural gig with a bag full of shiny new axes, yes?
Man in Mask: Man, get out of the car. We would have killed you already, except that California's new victim quota limits us to three gory murders per day.
Agent: I'll throw in some meat cleavers!
Man in Mask, stopping the truck: Out, out, OUT!!!!!!
B
r
y
a
n
B
e
r
t
i
n
o
-
-
t
h
e
G
r
i
p
p
i
n
g
G
a
f
f
e
r

We're here today with Professor Larry Longshot of the Spooky Films Division of the Motion Picture Institute of America. First of all, Professor, who is this Bryan Bertino person, anyway?

Well, he's that rare success that every writer hopes to become upon arriving in Hollywood with the proverbial suitcase full of dreams. For I must tell you, Jim: Just two years ago, this Bryan Bertino person, as you call him, was a 26-year-old Texan who was performing, shall we say, "less than gripping" work as a gaffer on a Hollywood movie set.

Less than gripping work as a gaffer, huh? That's a good one.

One does one's best, Jim.

I'm told he was essentially an electrician, right?

True enough.

So then he "scored" right away with a script?

Pretty much so. It was his fourth script, actually, that hit pay dirt.

I see.

And then he trained for a couple years with that old pal of mine, producer Jerry Bruckheimer of "Black Hawk Down" and "Armageddon" fame.

An old pal of yours?

Jerry and me? Are you kidding? We go way back.

But how did Bertino cinch the director's job on the "Strangers" flick?

Aha! That's where my old buddy Andrew Rona comes in. You know Andy, of course, from Rogue Pictures? You know: of "Scary Movie 3" and "Scream 3" fame?

I can't say that I do know him -- Indeed, I'm even tempted to say that YOU don't know him.

Ha! Very funny, Jim. No, seriously: my old pal Andy not only liked the script, but he liked Bertino as well, as subsequent events were to prove.

Indeed?

Well, good old Andy up and asked Bryan Bertino to direct his own film!

Interesting. But wasn't the script for "The Strangers" originally entered in some contest or other?

Oh, that's right. It apparently was a serious contender for a so-called Nicholl Fellowship from the Academy.

I see.

Anyway, the script didn't actually win the $30,000 prize money being offered, but it was certainly in the running, and thereby came to the notice of a manager at (I believe it was) Vertigo Entertainment.

And?

And before you could say "Is Tamara home?" Bertino had sold the script for six figures.

So Bertino was on his way.

Mind you, there was some luck involved, too, at least when it comes to Bertino directing.

How so?

Well, the erstwhile gaffer might have never directed the film if writer-director Mark Romanek (of "One Hour Photo" fame -- another friend of mine from school days) had been a little more conservative in his own budget demands for directing it himself.

So Mark was offered the director's job?

That he was, Jim, me lad.

I see.

But, Mark blew it, because he insisted up front on a minimum $40 million budget. Can you believe it?

Wow! One can see why this Andrew Rona person might have offered the job to Bryan after all.

Indeed.

Finally, Professor, can you tell us a little bit more about the film? Where was it shot, for instance?

Believe it or not, Jim, the film was shot down in a remote area of South Carolina -- which is odd considering how improbable that makes the snowy backdrop in the movie. But then I suppose you could say that the mayhem took place on "a cold day in hell," as they say?

And what are the critics saying?

Well, my good friend Dennis Harvey at Variety says, and I quote:
"
an
effectively stripped-down thriller ... should court correspondingly more robust patronage from mainstream fright fans ..."

Do any other reviews come to mind?

Let me see. There was another colleague of mine in L.A. who was bullish on Bertino.

Oh?

Yes, I believe it was the lovely Jessica Reaves of the Los Angels Times who said:
"First-time writer-director Bryan Bertino's taut, spare thriller is plenty scary."

I see. But didn't someone at USA Today pan the movie?

Oh, yes, you're talking about that infamous so-called "review" by Claudia Puig.

Another close friend of yours?

Don't be silly, Jim. I don't know EVERYBODY in the business, after all.

But what did she write about the movie?

You won't believe this, but she actually wrote, and I actually quote:
"The whole enterprise is pretty tedious, starting off so slowly...that you almost long for something terrifying to happen just to keep you awake."
I have to say, Jim, that I have seldom disagreed more wholeheartedly with a reviewer's statement in my life! It really makes me wonder what movie she saw. Certainly it wasn't the movie that had me grinding my teeth to nubs in almost constant anticipation of the next unpredictable shock.

I see.

If you ask me, Claudia must be a real bruiser of a truck-driving steelworker to be so impervious to fear.

Yes.

Imagine, though, if somebody like Claudia were to face the psychopaths in this movie -- I think the lunatics would be quite crestfallen to encounter a woman who finds their entire act so unconvincing. Here they are, skittering around the house and wearing evocative masks and asking eerily ambiguous questions, all in an effort to freak their victims out -- only to be humiliated by the improbable sangfroid of this Claudia person, who not only doesn't fear them, but actually finds them "tedious," if you please. It's enough to make a psychopath turn their kitchen knives into plowshares.

Ladies and gentlemen, how about a quick round of apple sauce for Professor Larry Longshot of the Spooky Films Division of the Motion Picture Institute of America, a man who seems to know everybody in -- and even out -- of Hollywood.

One gets around, Jim. One gets around.

Well, at least you don't claim to be on a first name basis with Bryan Bertino himself!

What, old Bry-boy, you mean?!

Oh, here we go.

I wasn't going to say anything for fear of bragging, but since you mention it yourself, Jim....